|
|
Under the
deckhouses the deck planking was continuous, and a shallow bevelled
score was let in to the outline of the deckhouse foundation cants,
which enabled the house to be bolted down and lightly caulked or payed.
Margin pieces could be fitted around the masts as the partners
and chocks below gave sufficient foundation for plank end fastenings as
well as the margin.
The treenail
fastenings for deck planks were driven down into the beams and then
tightened by hardwood wedges, the whole being cut off flush with the
deck. The fastenings, being end grain wood, did not wear away as soon
as the surrounding deck, and on an old ship would project as rounded
humps until planed or adzed down. Sometimes iron spike nails were used
instead of treenails, sunk into shallow drilled holes to allow for
dowel plugs to seal them.
With an iron or composite ship the decking procedure was
different in principle. The strength of the deck and its contribution
to the longitudinal strength of the ship was basically in the ironwork
structure. The side sheerstrake and deck stringer plate and angle took
the place of the wooden waterway and margin plank in giving strength,
although the latter were often applied in addition. The wooden binding
strakes were replaced by flat iron tie plates running fore and aft, and
the whole braced together with diagonal tie plates. The deck planking
itself was not so important for longitudinal strength, and the
outermost planks did not need to be carried so far forward in a curve
as on the wooden ship. The sharp ends of the planks meeting the curve
were still cut off square for the caulking iron, but the notching or
joggling was cut out of the margin plank instead of the deck planks. If
the deck line did have pronounced curvature, the outermost planks could
have some curvature and taper to avoid along narrow plank, but as soon
as possible inboard of this the planks would be laid down in straight
parallel lines.
Varying rules are given for the length of the sniped taper and
square tip for planks finishing on a curve, which are based on
proportions to the width of plank, but as planks could vary on
occasions from say 4 to 8 in. in width (teak planks
could go up to 9 in.), this could result in too much being
unnecessarily cut into the margin plank. The principle was that the
square end need only accommodate the caulking iron at about 2.5 in.
with the taper running from this point to the normal width of the
margin. As soon as the planks met the curve at about 3Oo there was no
need to square off the tip.
The openings, hatches, etc. were bounded by wide metal tie
plates athwartships and fore and aft, and the metal coamings connected
to them by angle irons. A margin plank was then laid down around the
coaming in teak or pine slightly thicker than the deck and
tapered down to deck level; the normal deck planking was butted against
the margin with its ends fastened to the tie plate.
|