|
|
If
spencers or
trysails (the small fore and aft sails with gaff, on the fore or main
masts) were fitted on large hooped masts, the mast would be too large
to conveniently take the gaff jaws or the hoops on the luff of the
sail, so a much smaller mast was stepped close to the larger with its
head let into a chock between the trestle trees and its foot stepped in
a socket on deck or to a mast band with an eye or socket a foot or so
above the deck. This small diameter mast took the gaff jaws and also
the wooden hoops seized to the sail. If the mizzenmast was considered
too large it also would have a try sail mast, which served the same
purpose as the extra mast which distinguishes a small craft called a
snow. A vertical iron rod jackstay bolted to the aft side of the mast
with a gooseneck fitting on a band for a hooked iron on the end of the
gaff, served the same purpose as the trysail mast and by mid-century
seems to have been fairly common on wooden masts and was carried on in
the same fashion for iron masts. The gaff of course was the
non-lowering type, and the head of the trysail ran on hoops along it
with an outhaul and inhaul, the body of the sail being brailed from
blocks attached to the jackstay or mast.
Iron masts were built intermittently from early in the century,
especially for steamships, but it was in the 186os, with the composite
clippers, when they became the general rule, at first for lower masts
only and then for topmasts as well. The lower yards and bowsprit were
also of iron, and the lower topsail yards, if large enough. The extra
strength of iron masts coupled with the more rigid iron wire rigging
encouraged a greater spread to the courses which was apparent in the
later clippers.
Iron masts, however, had their problems too, and many collapsed,
chiefly due to localized bad riveting and insufficient internal
stiffening. The restricted space
inside the masts made it difficult for rivets to be held up efficiently
while being hammered on the outside, and if a small man or boy could
not do it, a long rod was used as a lever to hold up a heavy iron dolly
like along mallet fitting against the rivet head, which was inserted
from the inside.
I recall an incident during the reconstruction of the Cutty Sark
involving one of these dollies, with near-fatal results. One of the
ship's masts, which had been a replacement after a dismasting, was
found to be some feet too short, and in consequence I suggested adding
the requisite length to the heel, thus avoiding altering the top and
its cheek plates. This meant raising the mast by chain hoists inside
the hold, seized around a heavy iron bar which passed through two holes
burned out of the mast. The mast had a full-Iength vertical diaphragm
plate as a stiffener, and a manhole was cut into the mast near the
holes so that the diaphragm could be penetrated also. After the strain
had been taken on the hoists, a shipwright put his head into the manhole
to see if all was correct and as he withdrew it, a loud clatter was
heard as a heavy iron dolly came hurtling downwards and bounced upwards
again from the keel.
|