|
|
From
a framework
with two wide crosstrees of near equal length they became shorter as
described above, the foremost in particular in order for the shroud to
clear the braced yard. Also the everincreasing height of mastheads
required very long backstays to the topgallant, royal and skysail
hounds, of such a length that they could not easily be kept taut
without undue strain. To increase their effective angles, spreaders
were angled outwards from across the crosstrees to touch each backstay
in line, and hold them a little further out by means of cleats. They
were usually held in these cleats by seizings or locking pins.
Spreaders did not become common until the second half of the century,
however .
They were stiffened by cross-bracings either straight across or
diagonally, which had to clear braces from mizzen, topgallant and royal
yards which sometimes led to the main topmast trestle trees.
The running rigging of American ships was often envied by
British seamen because it was lighter to handle and had larger blocks,
which also by mid-century were fitted with patent roller-bushed
sheaves. One reason for this increased size of blocks was that American
running rigging was made of manila, which was slightly weaker than the
hemp used on British ships and therefore had to be increased in size
for an equivalent breaking strain. Apart from this, however, the blocks
were made larger for easier working, according to comments made by
earlier writers, a fact which did not convince British shipowners who
preferred smaller and neater looking blocks aloft.
Hemp was used for standing rigging on American ships, however,
long after it had been superseded by wire on the British vessels.
|